Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28375-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4322 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Transport Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sharad Tewari Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard Shri Yogesh Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri Varun Pandey, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.2 and learned Counsel for the private opposite parties. 2. The petitioner claims certain rights in land which has been acquired by the opposite party No.2-UPEIDA. The sale deeds as alleged have been executed by the private opposite parties in respect to the said land in favour of opposite party No.2. The acquisition is by purchase of land and not a compulsory acquisition. Some mutation orders have been passed in favour of the private opposite parties which had been challenged by the petitioner in appeal and at this stage, it has been informed that the appeal of the petitioner has been rejected and revision is pending before the Commissioner. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner can avail other remedies but writ petition is not maintainable in such a scenario as noticed hereinabove. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 15.5.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench