SUSHEELA DEVI VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/4834/2025 · 2025-05-02
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25366 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4834 of 2025 Petitioner :- Susheela Devi Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Shri Manish Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Brijendra Singh learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the candidature of the petitioner on any post (as per her qualification) on compassionate ground under Dying-in- Harness Rules, in place of deceased employee, Late Deepak Kunwar Rawat (Forth Class employee). (ii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to decide the representation dated 17.04.2025 pending before opposite party No.3 contained as Annexure-4 to the writ petition."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure No.4) to the competent authority but to no avail. He has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e., District Inspector of Schools, District Unnao and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for
disposal of the said representation is issued. 5.
Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e., District Inspector of Schools, District Unnao ventilating her grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her enclosing therewith the copy of her earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other claimant, if any, with expedition preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench