Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138040 (ALL)

M/S HYDERABAD INTEGRATED MSW LTD. THRU. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MD. ZEESHANUL HAQUE v. LKO.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRU. MINICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/4216/2025 · 2025-05-02

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4216 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Hyderabad Integrated Msw Ltd. Thru. Authorized Signatory Md. Zeeshanul Haque Respondent :- Lko.Municipal Corporation Thru. Minicipal Commissioner And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Apoorva Tewari,Akshat Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Namit Sharma Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. Parties are ad-idem that the matter is similar to Writ-C No.3731 of 2025 [M/S Hyderabad Integrated Msw vs. Lucknow Municipal Corporation & Ors.] passed on 25.04.2025 except that this matter pertains to Package-1 of the tender and the order impugned herein is dated 11.04.2025. The order dated 25.04.2025 reads as under:- "1. Heard Shri Anil Tewari, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Apoorva Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Dr. L.P. Mishra, Advocate whose Power is taken on record, Shri Namit Sharma, Shri Tarun Mishra and Ms. Priyanka Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. After arguing at some length and on being confronted with certain facts, especially the fact that the work order dated 12.03.2025 was served upon the petitioner on 20.03.2025 and impugned order cancelling the contract has been passed on 09.04.2025, which was not preceded by any notice and the fact that the Nagar Nigam is aninstrumentality of State and a statutory body, the parties Counsel reconciled that within three days from today the Nagar Nigam shall give a notice to the petitioner proposing cancellation of contract on their WhatsApp and Email, whereupon the petitioner shall submit a response within the next five days. Thereafter, the opposite parties shall take an afresh decision in the matter, as per law. 3. In view of the aforesaid arrangement/ agreement, the impugned order is hereby quashed, subject to aforesaid. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. " 3. We, accordingly, dispose of this petition in terms of the above quoted order and quash the impunged order dated 11.04.2025 on the same terms. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench