Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13804 (KAR)

SRI C MUNIRAJU v. THE CHAIRMAN

WP/9850/2017 · 2025-01-22

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2717 WP No. 9850 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 9850 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI C.MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE PATEL CHANNAPPA, R/AT NO.570, 2ND BLOCK, PEENYA, BENGALURU-560 058. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.K.VENKATA REDDY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE CHAIRMAN, STATE COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES, AND SCHEDULED TRIBES, NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR , CFC BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 001. 3. JOINT COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA DIVISION, BENGALURU-560 098. 4. ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K G ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2717 WP No. 9850 of 2017 5. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O TALAVAR MUNISWAMAPPA, BY HIS SPECIAL ATTORNEY HOLDER, G.ANJINAPPA S/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.313, MARUTHINAGAR, HEGANNAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.JAGADISH., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. K.V.MOHAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & 3; SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondent No.4 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 20.01.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2717 WP No. 9850 of 2017 for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 22.01.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2