APHC010167482009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI PRADESH vC? THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT JULY the honourable smt justice sumathi CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO; nF onno JAGADAM Appeal under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 against the Succession Certificate dated 08-10-2007 in S.A.O.P No. 15 of 2006 of the District Judge, Ongoie to 1« Respondent. on the file Between: Union of India, Represented by its The Divisional Central Railway Vijayawada. Railway Manager South ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT AND 1. Puiugu Ratna Kumari @ Sarojini. W/o. Late Yesuratnam, aged about 46 years, Hindu, Cooly R/o. Munnamavaripaiem. Near Magunta Subbaramireddy Coiioege, Chinnaganjani,Prakasam District ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER W/o. Late Subba Reddy, aged about 76 Moolaganivaripalem, Chinnaganjam 2. Puiugu Venkata Subbamma years, Hindu, R/o. Prakasam District. Mandal ' ' 3. Pakanati Ankamma, W/o. Panakati Yedukondalu, aged about 36 years, Hindu, R/o. Moolaganivaripalem, Chinnaganjam Mandal, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2009tCMAMP 1246 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the certificate dated 08.10.2007 in SAOP No. 15/2006 on the file of the District Judge, Ongole Counsel for the Appellant: SRI G.ARUN SHOWRI{CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL) Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : SRI NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA The Court made the following JUDGMENT : /■ / APHC010167482009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 731/2009 Between: 1.UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY VIJAYAWADA. ...APPELLANT AND 1.PULUGU RATNA KUMARl SAROJINI AND 2 OTHERS, W/0. LATE YESURATNAM COOLY R/0. MUNNAMAVARIPALEM, NEAR MAGUNTA SUBBARAMIREDDY COLLOEGE, CHINNAGANJAM, 2.PULUGU VENKATA SUBBAMMA, W/0. LATE SUBBA REDDY, R/0. MOOLAGANIVARIPALEM, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3.PAKANATI ANKAMMA, W/0. PANAKATI YEDUKONDALU, R/0. MOOLAGANIVARIPALEM, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1.G.ARUN SHOWRI(CENTRAL GOVT. COUSEL) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA 2.VSUDHAKAR REDDY The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Learned counsel appearing for the parties have consented for disposal of this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by recording the settlement entered into by and between the parties before the Lok Adalat at Chirala on 18.02.2006 in O.S.No.81 of 2004. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands disposed of. No order as to costs. However, the appellant is directed to release all the monetary benefits to the respondent in terms of the compromise entered into by and between the parties, within two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR closed. // ^ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District (with records) One CC to Sri. G.Arun Showri(Central Govt.Counsel) Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Advocate [OPUC One CC to Sri. V Sudhakar Reddy Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. stu TAC HIGH COURT DATED:31/07/2025 JUDGMENT CMA NO. 731 OF 2009 SC 12 SEP 2025 viSCiigontSectjopx^y DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL