SHEILENDRA @ SHAILENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/25157/2015 · 2025-02-06
Samit Gopal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:17377 Court No. - 78 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25157 of 2015 Applicant :- Sheilendra @ Shailendra Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhilasha Singh,Ashutosh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Akhilesh Srivastava,G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
1. List revised.
2. No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter.
3. Sri Akhilesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 is also not present.
4. Sri Ajay Kishore Shukla, learned counsel for the State is present and records have been perused.
5. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants Sheilendra @ Shailendra Pratap Singh, Kalicharan and Smt. Kapoori Devi with the prayer to quash the impugned charge sheet filed in Case Crime No. 150 of 2014 (Amar Singh vs. Kalicharan and 2 others), under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Agra, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 8, Agra; and / or quash entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 1960 of 2015 arising out of Case Crime No. 150 of 2014 (Amar Singh vs. Kalicharan and 2 others), under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Agra, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 8, Agra.
6. The matter is listed today under the heading "Matter which are likely to be Infructuous"
7. Since there is no representation on behalf of the applicant and the matter is likely to have rendered infructuous as per office report, the present application is dismissed as infructuous.
8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
9. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
10. Office to communicate this order to the trial court concerned within a period of two weeks. (Samit Gopal,J.) Order Date :- 6.2.2025 / Manoj Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad