HIMANSHU KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/4891/2025 · 2025-05-05
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138018 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25754 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4891 of 2025 Petitioner :- Himanshu Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sati Prasad Singh @ Satish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri S.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Nitin Mathur, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for opposite party No.1 and Sri Ran Vijay Sigh, learned counsel for opposite party No.2.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party No.3 is hereby dispensed with.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that pursuant to the mutual transfer order, the petitioner has submitted his joining at the transfer place but after joining at the transfer place he is facing compelling difficulty, therefore liberty may be given to prefer a representation to opposite party No.2, who may take any appropriate decision strictly in accordance with law.
4. Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for opposite party No.2 has stated that since the request of the petitioner has already been considered, therefore, a fresh request in respect of same transfer may not be considered as per scheme, however, the portal of mutual transfer is presently open therefore, the petitioner may prefer a fresh representation.
5. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties, it is needless to say that it is always open for the teacher to prefer online representation till the time as the portal is open ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner, the same may disposed of strictly in accordance with law and policy, with expedition.
6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench