MAHARSHI PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/4277/2025 · 2025-05-05
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138014 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25797 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4277 of 2025 Petitioner :- Maharshi Pandey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Upadhyay,Diksha Tiwari,Sandeep Pandey,Saurabh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the concerned opposite party no.2 (Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil - Patti, District -Pratapgarh) to decide the objection filed by the petitioner no.1 in Case No. 7451/2024 (Surendra Prasad Pandey vs. Maharshi Pandey and others) within stipulated time in compliance of the order dated 12.12.2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ-C No. 10717/2024, in the interest of justice." Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case and the main relief(s) sought in this petition, quoted above, as well as the order dated 12.12.2024 passed by this Court in Writ-C No. 10717 of 2024 (Maharshi Pandey vs. State of U.P. and others), the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil- Patti, District- Pratagparh to consider and decide the objection filed in Case No. 7451 of 2024 (Surendra Prasad Pandey vs. Maharshi Pandey and others) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority/Court concerned shall be free to decide the aforesaid case/revision strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench