OM PRAKASH BAJPAI AND 35 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. COOPERATIVE U.P. LKO. AND 19 OTHERS
WRIA/4824/2025 · 2025-05-02
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25358 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4824 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Bajpai And 35 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Cooperative U.P. Lko. And 19 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shanker Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Akber Ahmad Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1.Heard Sri Kripa Shanker Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Devesh Chandra Pathak, learned Addl. Chief Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Sri Kushyamitra Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Akber Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 to 20.
2. There is consensus at Bar that the the matter in issue is squarely covered by the order dated 06.12.2024 passed in Writ A No.7820 of 2024 In re Kamal Krishna Mishra vs State of U.P. & 3 Ors, a copy of which is Annexure-5 to the writ petition. It is further contended that a special appeal filed against the said judgment vide Special Appeal No.09 of 2025 In Re: U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Ltd Lucknow & 2 Ors vs. Kamal Krishna Mishra & Anr. has been dismissed in limine vide judgment and order dated 10.01.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-6 to the writ petition. Thus, the judgment of this Court in the case of Kamal Krishna Mishra (supra) has attained finality.
3. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is allowed. It is provided that the petitioners are also entitled to the benefit of the judgment in the case of Kamal Krishna Mishra (supra) and the order impugned dated 02.07.2024 is quashed in so far as it pertains to the present petitioners.
4. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners that salary for the various months has not been paid to the petitioners.
5. In view thereof, the respondents are directed to pay outstanding salary to the petitioners without any deduction and continue to pay salary month to month in accordance with law under relevant rules, provided there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 2.5.2025/Reena (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench