Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25858 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4913 of 2025 Petitioner :- Qasim Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Rural Development, Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd.Yusuf Ansari,Rushida Farheen Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Kumar Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Yusuf Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vijay Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party Nos.1, 3, 4 & 5 and Sri Ram Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 & 6. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(1) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned termination order dated 19.12.2024 passed by the Joint Mission Director Uttar Pradesh Rajya Gramin Aajeevika Mission, Gramya Vikas, U.P., contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition. (2) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to allow the petitioner to work on his post of District Mission Manager (State Mission Coordination Board), Lakhimpur Kheri." 3. At the very outset, learned counsels for the opposite parties have raised objection that the present petition is an outsourced employee, therefore, his grievance may not be redressed by the Writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, it has been informed that the petitioner may approach the Competent Statutory Authority under the provisions of Labour Laws and any appropriate decision may be taken. 4. On being confronted learned counsel for the petitioner to convince the Court as to how any relief can be given by the Writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in favour of the outsourced employee, learned counsel for the petitioner could not demonstrate any provisions of law. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the writ petition is being disposed of finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Competent Authority under the provisions of Labour Laws preferring representation/ application and if such representation/ application is preferred, the same may be decided with expedition, strictly in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Suresh/ Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench