[2025:RJ-JP:18860] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4832/2025 Sudhanshu Kasliwal S/o (Late) Shri Ramchandra Ji Kasliwal, R/o House No. Sb-14, Bhawani Singh Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. M/s Sunder Band, Below Lal Haveli, Moti Singh Bhomiyon Ka Rasta, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Vasudev Khemani S/o (Late) Shri Tillumal, R/o M/s. Sunder Band, Below Lal Haveli, Moti Singh, Bhomiyon Ka Rasta, Jaipur (Rajasthan) And C-201/a, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Devendra Khemani S/o (Late) Shri Nanagram Khemani, R/o M/s. Sunder Band, Below Lal Haveli, Moti Singh, Bhomiyon Ka Rasta, Jaipur (Rajasthan) And C-201/a, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vikram Singh for Ms.Suruchi Kasliwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 05/05/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for issuing directions to the Rent Tribunal to decide the eviction application submitted by the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application under Section 9(a) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 2001”) was submitted by the petitioner against the respondents in the year 2019, but in [2025:RJ-JP:18860] (2 of 2) [CW-4832/2025] spite of passing of considerable time, till date the said application has not been decided. Counsel submits that age of petitioner is 76 years, so looking to his advanced age, in the interest of justice, appropriate direction be issued to the Tribunal to decide the said application expeditiously within a time frame. 3. Considering the aforesaid limited prayer of the petitioner and looking to the fact that the eviction application is lying pending before the Tribunal since last more than six years and also looking to the advanced age of the petitioner i.e., more than 76 years, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition with the direction to the Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending application, if any, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of one and half years from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /360