Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137880 (MAD)

Saima S v. The Inspector General of Police

WP(MD)/13034/2025 · 2025-04-30

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD) NO.13034 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD) No.13034 of 2025 S.Saima ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Inspector General of Police, Southern Zone, Madurai. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, (DCB), Dindigul District, Dindigul. 4. K.Murganandam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent by conducting enquiry based on the petitioner’s representation dated 17.02.2025. _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.13034 of 2025 For petitioner :Mr. SP.Vijaynivas For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ***** O R D E R This petition is filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the fourth respondent by conducting enquiry based on the petitioner’s representation dated 17.02.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to the civil dispute between the petitioner and the fourth respondent, the petitioner sent a representation dated 17.02.2025, but the same has not been considered. Hence, she filed this petition. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that they received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for enquiry by the second respondent. They will consider and take appropriate action within 15 days. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.13034 of 2025 4. Considering the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without issuing notice to the fourth respondent, is inclined to pass orders. 5. Since the representation of the petitioner is under consideration of the third respondent, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the same and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of 15 days from the date of this order, after affording opportunity to both the parties. 6. With the abovesaid observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 30.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1. The Inspector General of Police, Southern Zone, Madurai. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul. _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.13034 of 2025 3. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, (DCB), Dindigul District, Dindigul. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD) NO.13034 of 2025 P.DHANABAL,J apd W.P.(MD) No.13034 of 2025 30.04.2025 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis