APHC010278312017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2811/2017 Between: M/s Sree Ram Mushty & Co, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND M/s Shriram Chits P Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAROSH SAM BASTAWALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2776/2017 Between: M/s Sree Ram Mushty & Co and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND M/s Shrtram Chits P Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURRATHI PRASAD 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2812/2017 Between: M/s Sree Ram Mushty & Co, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND M/s Shriram Chits P Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURRATHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2880/2017 Between: M/s Sree Ram Mushty & Co, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND M/s Shriram Chits P Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURRATHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2886/2017 Between: M/s Sree Ram Mushty & Co, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) 3 AND Shriram Chits P Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURRATHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3316/2017 Between: M/s Sree Ram Mushty & Co, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND M/s Shriram Chits P Ltd and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURRATHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . 4 The Court made the following common order: When the matter was taken up for consideration on 19.10.2024, 29.10.2024, 08.11.2024 & 15.11.2024 there was no representation for the petitioner. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Sri O.Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents is present. 3. Despite giving ample opportunities to the counsel for the petitioner, he did not choose to appear in the matter. It shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the cases. In that view of matter, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.13.02.2025 DSB 5 114 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP Nos.2811, 2776, 2812, 2886 & 3316 of 2017 Date 13.02.2025 U DSB