Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137845 (MAD)

Gopikrishnan v. The Tahsildar

WP(MD)/13026/2025 · 2025-04-29

J Nisha Banu, S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.13026 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No.13026 of 2025 Gopikrishnan ...Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Tahsildar, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 2.Block Development Officer, Thoppampatti Panchayat Union, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.Village Adminstrative Officer/ Monitoring Committee, Thoppampatti Panchayat, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 4.Nagammal ...Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 4 to 7 by way of blocking the cart track from S.No.359/5 to 359/9 situated at Valantharavai Village, Ramanathapuram Taluk, Ramanathapuram District in the light of the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2025 within the time stipulated by this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.13026 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.B.Azhagesh For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.S.Madhavan Additional Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) By consent, this writ petition is taken up for admission at the admission stage itself. 2.Mr.S.S.Madhavan, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with. 3.The grievance of the petitioner is that his representation dated 24.09.2024 seeking to remove the encroachment made in the petition mentioned property, has not been considered so far. Therefore, he has filed this Writ Petition. 4.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the official respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law within a period that may be stipulated by this Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.13026 of 2025 5.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24.09.2024 by giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. (J.N.B.,J.) (S.S.Y.,J.) 29.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ta To 1.The Tahsildar, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 2.Block Development Officer, Thoppampatti Panchayat Union, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.Village Adminstrative Officer/ Monitoring Committee, Thoppampatti Panchayat, Athoor Taluk, Dindigul District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.13026 of 2025 J. NISHA BANU,J. and S.SRIMATHY.J ta W.P.(MD)No.13026 of 2025 29.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis