Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.2567 of 2024
Rishipal ….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.330 of 2024, under Sections 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Kankhal, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
According to the FIR, on 11.10.2024, 133 gm charas was allegedly recovered from the possession of the applicant.
4.
It is the case of the applicant that he has been falsely implicated; there is no independent witness; it is a case of non compliance of the provision of the Act; he is not a previous convict.
2
5.
Learned State Counsel would submit that although the applicant is not a previous convict, but he was involved in similar nature of cases in the past.
6.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7.
The bail application is allowed.
8.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J)
02.01.2025 Ravi