[2025:RJ-JP:17734] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7142/2024 Nemichand S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Ward No. 2, Badagaon, Tehsil- Gudhagodji, Distt- Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)- 333021 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Sub Divisional Magistrate- Udaipurwati, Distt- Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 2. Tehsildar- Gudhagodji, Distt- Jhunjhunu. 3. Nayab Tehsildar-Gudhagodji, Distt- Jhunjhunu. 4. Patwari, Patwar Halka- Badagaon, Tehsil-Gudhagodji, Distt- Jhunjhunu. 5. Gokulchand S/o Hanuman, R/o Badagaon, Tehsil- Gudhagodji, Distt- Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)-333021 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Rohitash Kumar Saini JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/04/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a suit filed by the petitioner, an interim order was passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu on 14.10.2020 by which the parties to the suit were directed to maintain status quo. Counsel submits that the other side is not obeying the interim order passed by the Court concerned, hence, under these circumstances, two applications were submitted before the Court of Sub-Divisional Officer on 26.04.2023 and 14.07.2023, but in spite of passing of considerable time, till date, those applications have not been decided, therefore, appropriate directions be issued [2025:RJ-JP:17734] (2 of 2) [CW-7142/2024] to the Sub-Divisional Officer to decide the said application expeditiously as early as possible within a time frame. 2. Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the expectation from the Sub-Divisional Officer to decide the application (pending, if any) for compliance of the order dated 14.10.2020 expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties. 3. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 4. Before parting with the order, it is made clear that this Court has not passed any direction/order to the Sub-Divisional Officer to decide the pending application of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /6