Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137817 (ALL)

KM. SONALI LAKRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/4240/2025 · 2025-05-07

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26588-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4240 of 2025 Petitioner :- Km. Sonali Lakra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Mr. Jayesh Bhoosreddy, learned Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 which is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. Counsel for opposite party no. 2 has no objection to the complaint/representation of the petitioner against opposite party no. 3 being considered and decided under the U.P. Apartment (Promotion of Construction, Ownership and Maintenance) Act, 2010 by the competent authority who is the Vice Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority. Let the competent authority take decision at the earliest, say, within six weeks of receipt of certified copy of this order unless there is any legal impediment in which he shall communicate the same to the petitioner in writing. 4. If the petitioner is still aggrieved or the competent authority cannot decide any issue, she can avail the remedies as may be prescribed in law as there are limitations to the exercise of writ jurisdiction in respect of such a dispute as being raised herein. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench