HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2498/2022 Mudassir Ahmed Bhat …..Petitioner Through: Proxy counsel vice Mr. N.D. Qazi, Advocate Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondents Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (20.12.2025) 01. The institution of this writ petition by the petitioner was with a purpose to get adequate security cover to his person and to his family members purportedly on account of life threats to his life at the hands of private respondents. 02. In the entire writ petition, the petitioner has not referred to any fact as to whether for any act of criminal intimidation at the end of the private respondents giving cause of concern to the petitioner about the safety and security of his life and limb, the petitioner led himself first to concerned Police Station with a complaint for lodging of FIR, as such, the petitioner is not entitled to Serial No. 24 Supplementary List-1 2 WP(C) No. 2498/2022 ask for so-called security cover to his person as well as family members by reference to the alleged undefined and unexplained acts of omission or commission at the part of the private respondents giving the apprehension to the petitioner to come forward with the writ petition, as such, the writ petition is dismissed notwithstanding the non- appearance of counsel for the petitioner. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 20.12.2025 SUNIL Whether the order is speaking ? : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable ? : Yes/No