MAINUDDIN AND 2 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/3718/2025 · 2025-05-06
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26099-DB
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3718 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mainuddin And 2 Others Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sumit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned A.G.A. for State-opposite parties no.1 to 3.
2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioners prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to take appropriate proceedings before any other appropriate court of law or authority as may be permissible in law.
3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the same.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is consigned to record as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed above. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary J.) Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench