Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137777 (ALL)

SUNITA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/4182/2025 · 2025-05-09

Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Attau Rahman Masoodi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27206-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4182 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunita Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Singh,Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The averment made in the writ petition shows that some claim instituted under 'Mukhyamantri Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna' is pending before the competent authority which according to the petitioner has not been considered and decided. 3. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that though the claim under 'Mukhyamantri Krashak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna' was instituted by the petitioner belatedly yet the innocuous prayer for consideration of the pending claim may be decided on its own merit in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly without going into the merit of the case, the competent authority is hereby directed to consider and decide the pending claim expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from the date of service of a copy of the order. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. ) (Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.) Order Date :- 9.5.2025/Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench