Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137769 (MAD)

Muthuraja v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CRL OP(MD)/8274/2025 · 2025-04-30

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P(MD)No.8274 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Crl.O.P(MD)No.8274 of 2025 Muthuraja ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, CCB, Unit III, Madurai City. 3. Ahamed ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass this petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the complaint given by the 3rd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.J.William Christopher For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1- R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.8274 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass this petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the complaint given by the 3rd respondents. 2.According to the petitioner, based on the complaint given by the private respondent, the respondent police has frequently called the petitioner for enquiry and harassed him. Hence this petition. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that they have called the petitioner for enquiry based on the complaint given by the private respondent and apart from that they have not harassed him under the guise of enquiry. However, they will conduct enquiry based on the complaint of the 3rd respondent and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of 15 days. 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondent, is inclined to pass order. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.8274 of 2025 5.Considering the prayer of the petitioner and the second respondent also denied the alleged harassment made by the petitioner, this Court is hereby directs the second respondent to conduct enquiry on the complaint of the 3rd respondent and dispose the same within a period of 15 days from the date of this order, after affording opportunity to both the parties, in accordance with law. It is needless to mention that if the matter is pertains to money dispute, the respondent police shall follow the Circulars issued by the Higher Authorities in this regard. 6.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 30.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To 1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, CCB, Unit III, Madurai City. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.8274 of 2025 P. DHANABAL, J. PNM ORDER IN Crl.O.P(MD)No.8274 of 2025 30.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis