Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13775 (BOM)

KIRANKUMAR JAGANNATH GUTTEDAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/1218/2022 · 2025-03-10

Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 19 appln.1218.22.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 19 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1218 OF 2022 1) Kirankumar S/o Jagannath Guttedar. 2) Deepa w/o Kirankumar Guttedar. 3) Kaweri D/o Jagannath Guttedar. 4) Kirti W/o Arvind Goud. … Applicants Versus 1) The State of Maharashtra. 2) Vandana w/o Kirankumar Guttedar (C/o Balkishan Hibbane). … Respondents ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Avinash N. Suryawanshi. APP for Respondent / State : Smt. R. P. Gour. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sanket Shantaram Palnitkar. ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 10th March, 2025. P.C.: . The learned APP as well as the learned counsel for respondent No.2 submit that the trial has already commenced and four witnesses have been examined in the matter. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that only one witness is remaining. 2 Under such circumstance, this is not a fit case where we should exercise our inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 3 Hence, we dispose of the application. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ] nga 2025:BHC-AUG:6901-DB