Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13772 (AP)

Sri Avula Krishnaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/20902/2016 · 2025-06-26

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010167442016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 20902/2016 Between: 1. SRI AVULA KRISHNAIAH,, S/O. LATE CHENCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: ASSISTANT MANAGER, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., GUDUR BRANCH, R/O. D.NO. 11-422, MANDARILLU STREET, VENKATAGIRI TOWN, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 524 132. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR, OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GRUHAKALPA, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PRESIDENT, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, NELLORE, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT, DISTRICT CO- OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, NELLORE, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing retirement 2 notice to the petitioner dated 14-06-2016 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Act 4 of 2014 dated 27.06.2014, G.O.Ms. No.147, dated 30.6.2014 and contrary to 1St Respondent Memo No.5825/Coop.III/2014-7, dated 23.05.2015 and Proceedings vide Rc.No.9362/2014/Cr2, dated 22.08.2015 and also in violation of Proceedings dated 10-08-2015, 12-08-2015 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminative, in violation of principles of natural justice, violative of the Fundamental Right guaranteed under Articles 14 and the Constitutional Right guaranteed under Constitution of India and set aside the retirement notice and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service in the interests of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 25642 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to continue the petitioner service in accordance with Act 4 of 2014 dated 27.06.2014, G.O.Ms. No. 147, dated 30.6.2014, Memo No. 58251 Coop.III/2014-7, dated 23.05.2015 and Proceedings vide Rc.No.9362/ 2014/Cr2, dated 22.08.2015 and Proceedings dated 10-08-2015, 12-082015 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interests of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SYED ARIF BASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI 2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: On 20.06.2025, none appeared for the petitioner. 2. Today i.e., on 27.06.2025, despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Sri V. Sreekanth, learned counsel representing Sri Venati Sivaprasad Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 3 and 4, submits that writ petitioner retired from the service on 30.06.2016 itself. Thus, the writ petition becomes infructuous. 3 4. Taking into consideration the above submission that the petitioner retired from the service and in view of efflux of time, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 27.06.2025 GVK 4 71 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.20902 of 2016 Date: 27.06.2025 GVK