CRM-M-22927 203 IN THE Hazara Singh State of Punjab CORAM: Present: SUMEET GO 1. Criminal Proc anticipatory under Section short ‘IPC’) Fatehgarh Sah 2. p 22927-2024 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of Singh alias Hajara Singh versus Punjab HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUM Mr. D.S. Khurana, Advocate for Mr. Gurpartap Singh Bhullar, A Dr. Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Senior A Mr. G.P.S. Ghuman, Advocate fo ***** T GOEL, J. (ORAL) Present petition has been filed und l Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr. P.C tory bail to the petitioner in case FIR ections 304, 323, 341, 506, 34 of the PC’), registered at Police Station rh Sahib. On 08.05.2024, the following ord “The present petition has been the grant of anticipatory bail to the p him vide FIR No.0007 dated 17.01.2 506 and 34 IPC at Police Station Ba Sahib. The learned counsel for the taking the allegations to be correct, Satwinder Singh and not that of the pr attributed any injury on the person o the allegation against the non-petitio pushed the deceased. Notice of motion for 04.07.2024 1 NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH -M-22927-2024 (O&M) ate of decision: August 01, 2025 ....Petitioner ....Respondent SUMEET GOEL for the petitioner. AAG Punjab. enior Advocate with ate for the complainant. led under Section 438 of the Code of r. P.C.’) for grant of concession of ase FIR No.0007 dated 13.01.2024, of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for tation Badali Ala Singh, District ng order was passed: been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for he petitioner in case registered against 01.2024 under Sections 304, 323, 341, Badali Ala Singh, District Fatehgarh the petitioner inter alia contends that rect, the liability, if any, would be of he present petitioner as he has not been on of the deceased-Amarjit Kaur. Even titioner/Satwinder Singh are of having 2024. ioner dent de of n of , (for strict for nst 41, arh hat of een ven ing MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.01 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-22927 p 3. to the order da and his custod 4. opposed the g allegations ag extended the c may threaten 5. of the record having joined the petitioner misused the co order dated enumerated un 22927-2024 (O&M) Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, A accepts notice on behalf of the State. In the meantime, the petitione SHO/Investigating Officer to join inv arrest, he shall be released on bail o satisfaction of SHO/Investigating A conditions as envisaged under Section (i) that the petitioner sha interrogation before the inv required; (ii) that the petitioner shall n inducement, threat or promise facts of the case as to dissuade to the Court or to any police off (iii) that the petitioner shall n permission of the Court and sha Meanwhile, the State is directe exact role of the petitioner and his c pending FIRs, if any, on or before the n Learned State counsel (on instruc rder dated 08.05.2024, the petitioner h custodial interrogation is not required Learned Senior counsel for the the grant of anticipatory bail to the ns against the petitioner are serious the concession of anticipatory bail, eaten the witnesses as also influence th Having heard learned counsel fo ecord; especially keeping in view of joined investigation and State not seek tioner and there being no material the concession of interim anticipator ated 08.05.2024 is made absolute, ted under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. 2 h, AAG, Punjab, present in the Court, tioner is directed to appear before the investigation and in the event of his ail on his furnishing bail bonds to the g Agency, subject to the following tion 438(2) Cr.P.C.:- shall make himself available for investigating officer as and when ll not, directly or indirectly make any mise to any person acquainted with the uade him/her from disclosing such facts e officer; all not leave the country without prior d shall surrender his passport, if any. rected to file an affidavit/reply as to the his co-accused alongwith the details of the next date of hearing.” instructions) has stated that pursuant oner has indeed joined investigation, uired. or the complainant has vehemently to the petitioner by arguing that the erious in nature and in case, he is bail, there is all likelihood that he the investigation. sel for the parties and upon perusal iew of the factum of the petitioner seeking custodial interrogation of terial against the petitioner having ipatory bail for 01 year; the interim lute, subject to the conditions as . rt, the his the ing for en ny the cts ior the of suant tion, ently t the he is at he rusal ioner n of ving terim s as MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.01 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM-M-22927 6. be read grant confined to th other incident 7. cancellation/re stipulated und sufficient caus 8. be construed to 9. August 01, 20 mahavir Whether speakin Whether reportab 22927-2024 (O&M) This order should not be treated granting petitioner indefinite protec to the FIR mentioned ibid and will cident that involves commission of an Liberty is reserved in favour of S tion/recall of this order in case the pe d under Section 438(2) of Cr. P.C. t cause. Needless to say that anything ob rued to be an opinion on the merits of Pending application(s), if any, sha , 2025 peaking/reasoned: Yes/No eportable: Yes/No 3 eated as “blanket” order. It will not protection from arrest. It shall be d will not operate in respect of any of an offence. ur of State/complainant to move for the petitioner violates any condition . P.C. or upon showing any other ing observed herein above shall not rits of the case. ny, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE l not ll be any e for on other l not MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.08.01 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment