Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13769 (UTT)

VIVEK GUPTA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY REVENUE SECRETARIAT DEHRADUN

WPMS/3885/2018 · 2025-03-04

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No. 3885 of 2018 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. By the instant writ petition, petitioner is praying for the following relief: “i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to consider the name of the petitioner as per UPZA & LR Act and further the authorities be directed to record the name of the petitioner in accordance with law as recorded in respect of similarly situated persons in respect of the land bearing Khasra No. 99/1 M situated at village – Fazalpur, Mehrola, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present writ petition has rendered infructuous. 5. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 04.03.2025 SKS