APHC010167202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8825/2025 Between: Mangabathi Sangaiya ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:8825/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief: “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondents particularly 4th respondent on my Mee seva Application dated 18.02.2025 submitted for granting E- Pattadar Pass book-cum-Title Deed and mutation of my name in all online web land revenue record of Rights such as Pattadar/Adangal pahanies, IB-Register connected to my agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extent of Ac.1.16 cents covered by Survey Numbers 392/1 and Ac.2.26 Cents Covered by Survey No.392/2 and same was situated at Sadasiviapuram Village in K.V.B puram Mandal of Tirupati District and declare the same as illegal, irregular and arbitrary and amounts to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on the part of 4th respondent under the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to grant me E-Pattadar Passbook-cum-Title Deed and also update my name in all online web land revenue record of rights for the applied extent of lands by duly processing my aforesaid application and pass such other order or orders ….” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. The claim of the petitioner herein is that the petitioner herein is the absolute owner of the land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.1.16 cents in Sy.No.392/1 and Ac.2.26 cents in Sy.No.392/2 situated at Sadasivapuram Village, K.V.B Puram Mandal, Tirupathi District having acquired the same through a registered relinquishment deed dated 28.11.2024 from the legal heirs of the original pattadar Sri C.Veera Raghavan. After acquisition of the said lands, the petitioner herein submitted an application dated 18.02.2025 in Form-6a seeking mutation as well as for issuance of e-pattadar pass book- cum- title deed in his favour and for entries to be made in the web online records. Even after receipt of the said application, the respondents, so far, neither considered the same nor issued any proceedings. Hence, the writ petition. 4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader for the respondents furnished written instructions dated 03.04.2025 issued by respondent No.4, wherein, the relevant portion reads as follows: “It is submitted that, an extent of Ac.1.16 cents in Sy.No.392-1 and an extent of Ac.2.26 cents in Sy.No.392-2 of Sadasivapuram Village accounts were noted in the name of G.Veeraraghavan S/o.Chengaiah vide 1B Khata No.193 as per web land adangal who is brother of the writ petitioner herein. In response to the mutation raised by the writ petitioner, notice in Form No VIII under the provisions of A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 generated and publication, objections received from the present enjoyers stating that they have purchased from the writ petitions and his family members on 07.11.1999 and that they are in continuous in possession and enjoyment and requested not to mutate the writ petitioner name in web land adangal. Hence, it is dire necessity to conduct a detailed enquiry on this matter duly giving opportunity to both parties as per rules. After completion of enquiry, appropriate action will taken in accordance with provisions of law. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for the respondents and on perusal of the written instructions placed on record, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition can be disposed of, directing the respondent authorities, more particularly, respondent No.4 to conduct a detailed enquiry and after completion of such enquiry, to pass appropriate orders, as enumerated in the written instructions stated supra, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 07.04.2025 BSP 51 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.8825 of 2025 07.04.2025 BSP