Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137664 (MAD)

Sethuraman v. The Sub Registrar

WP(MD)/13472/2025 · 2025-06-19

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.(MD)No. 13472 of 2025 Sethuraman ... Petitioner vs. The Sub Registrar, O/o. the Sub Registrar Office, Kariyapatti, Virudhunagar District. ...Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to the check slip dated.23/04/2025 in RFL/Kariyapatti/19/2025 and Quash the same and directing the respondent to receive the document dated.21/04/2025 styled as Sale Deed for registration and register the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.S.Saji Bino, Special Government Pleader _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned check slip dated 23.04.2025 and consequently direct the respondent to receive the document dated 21.04.2025 and register the same. 2. The petitioner had purchased the land in S.No. 45/3A1A1A presently assigned R.S.No.45/125 admeasuring 180 square meter. At the time of execution, the classification of the said land was shown as "Natham." Now the petitioner intended to sell the property by showing the classification as "Punja" land. The respondents have refused to register the sale deed by pointing out the change in classification. 3. The petitioner to substantiate the classification as “punja” land had relied on the communication dated 16.04.2025 issued by the Revenue Tahsildar, Kariyapatti, to the Sub-Registrar, Kariyapatti, which states that Survey No. 45/125B is not found in the Natham village ac- _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis counts and further states that the said S.No.45/125B is classified as pun- ja. The relevant portion is extracted hereunder: “NkYk; Gy vz;.45-125gp gug;G 0.01.00 ncwf;Nlh; epyj;ijg; nghWj;jtiu> 'jdp egUf;Fhpa' uaj;J – Gd;nra; tifg;ghL cila epyk; MFk;. Nkw;fz;l Gy vz;. 45-125gp gug;G 0.01.00 ncwf;Nlh; epyk;> fpuhkf; fzf;fpy; Gd;nra;-y; kl;LNk gjpT cs;sJ. NkYk; fl;Lf;Fj;jif fhpry;Fsk; fpuhkk;> ej;jk; fpuhkf;fzf;Ffspy; Nkw;gb Gy vz; Fwpj;j gjpTfs; vJTk; ,y;iy. Nkw;fz;l uaj;J – Gd;nra; Gy vz;. 45-125gp gug;G 0.01.00 ncwf;Nlh; epyk; Gd;nra; tifg;ghl;by; cs;s kid epyk;”. 4. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opin- ion when the Revenue Department has clearly clarified that the land is classified as Punja, the refusal check slip issued by the respondent refus- ing registration is erroneous and liable to be quashed. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. The impugned refusal check slip dated 23.04.2025 is hereby quashed and the respondent is directed to register the sale deed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No Costs. 19.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes KSA _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To The Sub Registrar, O/o. the Sub Registrar Office, Kariyapatti, Virudhunagar District. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.SRIMATHY, J. KSA ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.13472 of 2025 DATED :19.06.2025 _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis