HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1005610 of 2005 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. List has been revised. None for the petitioners. Sri Sachin Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent and learned Standing Counsel are present. 2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. September 11, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.Naseer Ullah, Dilip Mishra, Narendra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, Dinesh Mishra, R.N. Gupta, Rajesh Kumar, Ramesh Singh (Irshad Ali,J.) Lallu Ram And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Collector Pratapgarh And 6 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench