WP.No.13932 of 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD WP.No.13932 of 2002 1.C.Balakrishnan S/o.Chinnaiyan. 2.Prakasam, S/o.Annamalai, 3.Thavamani, S/o.Gopal 4.Jothi, W/o.Shivaraj all residing at Perampattu Village, Tirupattur Taluk, Vellore District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Collector (Rural Development Section) Collector Office, Vellore 9. 2.The Block Development Officer, (B.D.O) Kanthili Panchayat Union, Tirupattur Taluk. 3.The Panchayat President, Perampattu Panchayat, Kanthili Panchayat Union, 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.13932 of 2002 Tirupattur Taluk. 4.Panjali W/o.Devan 5.Pappathi W/o.Velayutham 6.Murugammal W/o.Velayutham 7.Muniammal W/o.Vajravelu 8.Unnamalai W/o Ethiraj 9.Jayanthi W/o Thavamani 10.Kamala W/o.Kuppan 11.Krishnammal W/o. Venkatesan 12.Kullapatti W/o Perumal 13.Theerthammal W/o Kamaraj 14.Manickam W/o Sundaresan 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.13932 of 2002 15.Rajeswari W/o Govindaraj 16.Kasiammal W/o Jadaiyan 17.Thavamani W/o Paranthaman 18.Poongavanam W/o Subramani 19.Chennammal W/o Devendran 20.Muniyan S/o Chinnathambi 21.Ezhilarasi D/o Natarajan 22.Jaya W/o Iyyadurai 23.Sangeetha W/o Selvam R4 to 23 are residing at Perampattu Village, Kanthili Panchayat Union Tirupattur Taluk. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Block Development Officer, Kanthili Panchayat Union, the 2 nd respondent herein culminating in Na.Ka.A2/3709/2001 dated 02.01.2002 quash the same and direct respondents 2 and 3 to select the 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.13932 of 2002 beneficiaries of 20 group houses under the “Annamarumalarchi Scheme” as per the resolution of the Grama Sabha dated 30.11.2001 of Perampattu Panchayat and pass such further orders. For Petitioners: No appearance For Respondents: Mr.M.Rajendiran, Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing on 21.04.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “For Dismissal” on 23.04.2025. 2. Even today, 23.04.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing at 11.45 a.m., none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It is made clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Since there is no representation for the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.13932 of 2002 In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed for Non- Prosecution. No costs. 23-04-2025 cda Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order To 1.The District Collector (Rural Development Section) Collector Office, Vellore 9. 2.The Block Development Officer, (B.D.O) Kanthili Panchayat Union, Tirupattur Taluk. 3.The Panchayat President, Perampattu Panchayat, Kanthili Panchayat Union, Tirupattur Taluk. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.13932 of 2002 J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD J. cda WP.No.13932 of 2002 23-04-2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis