IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5539 of 2024 Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Lalit Narayan Sharma & Anr. …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that present petition has been rendered infructuous, on account of subsequent developments, as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 10, 2025 (Sunil) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?