204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-41-1997 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 27, 2025 China Singh and others … Appellants Versus Sajjan Singh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate for Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the appellants. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that despite all possible efforts, none of the appellants have contacted them. Noce was sent to the appellants and as per office report, appellant No.1 had been served through his wife and appellant No.2 is reported to be not residing at the given address; whereas appellant No.3 is reported to have expired. No one has come forward to be implead the LRs of appellant No.3. Nobody has come forward so as to pursue this appeal and as stated by learned counsel for the appellants, none from the appellants’ side has contacted him In the aforesaid circumstances, the present appeal is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecuon. November 27, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.11.27 17:53 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order