ANJU v. TEHSILDAR JUDICIAL, TEHSIL BIKAPUR, DISTRICT AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/2658/2025 · 2025-05-06
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137619 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137619 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26154 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2658 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anju Respondent :- Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-
"Issue any appropriate order or direction to opposite party no-1 to consider and deciding the recall application filled by the Petitioner Dated 11-03-2024 against the order dated 11-03-2024 in mutation Case no 3081/2023 & computerized Case no. T-202304230303081 (Anju Versus Kishor Pati) under section 34 U.P. Revenue Code 2006 filed by the petitioner which is pending before opposite party no-1.since 2024." Taking note of the fact that recall application in mutation case is pending since March and also that the case related to mutation of name(s) in revenue records should be decided expeditiously, being summary in nature, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent No.-1 to consider and decide the pending recall application dated 11.03.2024, in Case no 3081/2023 & computerized Case no. T-202304230303081 (Anju Versus Kishor Pati), after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within two months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is also expected from the authority concerned to conclude the proceedings expeditiously say within a period of three months, as per law, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench