Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137617 (ALL)

SMT.SHAJNAZ BANO U.P.Z.A.L.R. v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER FAIZABAD DIVISION AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/1003670/2005 · 2025-09-08

Irshad Ali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1003670 of 2005 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Today the case is listed peremptorily. 2. Sri SC Sitapur, learned counsel for the petitioner is on sanctioned leave. 3. When the case is listed peremptorily, no adjournments / pass over are allowed. The petitioner has to make some arrangement to argue the matter. 4. List of cases has been revised. 5. No-one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned Additional CSC for respondent - State is present. 6. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 8, 2025 Adarsh K Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.C.Sitapuri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi, R.N.Gupta, Rajendra P. Tiwari (Irshad Ali,J.) Smt.Shajnaz Bano U.P.Z.A.L.R. .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Faizabad Division And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ADARSH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench