Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137615 (ALL)

LALSAHAB v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/481/2025 · 2025-05-08

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26896 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 481 of 2025 Applicant :- Lalsahab Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of opposite party no.1. 2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.2 stand dispensed with. 3. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 4. First Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with regard to Range Case No.03/2020-21, Case no.14179 of 2020 under Sections 09, 27, 29, 31,39, 49B, 51(1C), 52 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, Police Station Sujauli, District Bahraich. 5. As per contents of F.I.R., the incident is said to have taken place on 23.04.2020 at about 10.15 A.M. when a forest team acting upon information received, caught the nominated persons in the act of killing of a leopard cow. 6. Learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the charges levelled against him and his name has been introduced only on the basis of alleged confessional statements of persons who were apprehended from the spot. 7. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of State has opposed the bail application with submission that the allegations levelled against applicant are serious in nature and he is not cooperating in the investigation due to which non-bailable warrant has been issued against him. It is submitted that co- accused Ramadal parity of whom has been sought had been enlarged on bail in regular bail proceedings. 8. Considering aforesaid submissions and in view of fact that applicant is not cooperating in the investigation, this Court does not find any good ground to grant indulgence in the matter. However, applicant is granted liberty to approach trial court for regular bail, which may be considered expeditiously. 9. Anticipatory Bail Application is finally disposed of with aforesaid observation. Order Date :- 8.5.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench