APHC010167192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8804/2025 Between: Kanaparthy Bala Swamy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8804/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in keeping pending the F-Line Application of the petitioner for conducting of survey and fixed boundaries over D.No.7-97-1 in an extent of Ac.0.66 cents situated in Vanukuru, NTR District, Andhra Pradesh despite the petitioner had paid requisite fee vide its F-Line Application N0.SBA012400205724, dated 23.12.2024 more than 30 days is contrary to the Section 5 (1) proviso of Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to dispose the F-Line Application No.SBA012400205724, dated 23.12.2024 and pass such other order.” 2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the f-line application dated 23.12.2024 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue agreed to dispose of the f-line application dated 23.12.2024, if any pending with the respondents. 4. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the 3 truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of f-line application dated 23.12.2024, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the f-line application dated 23.12.2024 filed by the petitioner, within a period of three(3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 07.04.2025 TTPPSS 1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 4 162 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8804 of 2025 07.04.2025 TTPPSS 5