NAIM ULLA KHAN v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/2513/2025 · 2025-05-02
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137599 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137599 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25390 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2513 of 2025 Petitioner :- Naim Ulla Khan Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Yogesh Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party No.1 as well as Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party No.15/Gaon Sabha and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief :-
"I. Issue a order or direction commanding the Learned Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Mandal Ayodhya, to hear and decide, Application for Interim relief filed alongwith the Appeal bearing Number 929/2025 filed by the petitioner, as contained in annexure no 2 to this petition, as early as possible." Taking note of the fact that on account of pendency of the application seeking interim relief, the petitioner is suffering great hardship, the indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the application for disposal of interim relief which is pending since
22.04.2025. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No.15 submitted that they have no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.1/Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the interim relief application most expeditiously, if possible on the next date fixed in the matter i.e. on 08.05.2025, as informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and if for some reason it could not be decided on the next date fixed, the same shall be decided within one month, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably, if there is no other legal impediment. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.5.2025/ML Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench