DESH RAJ AND ANOTHER L/R ACT v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER LUCKNOW DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/1002743/2005 · 2025-08-26
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137590 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137590 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1002743 of 2005 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. Sri Jai Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anoop Srivastava-II, learned counsel for the petitioners made statement that the writ petition may be dismissed for want of instruction.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instruction. August 26, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anoop Srivastava Ii Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., R.N.Gupta (Irshad Ali,J.) Desh Raj And Another L/R Act .....Petitioner(s) The Additional Commissioner Lucknow Division And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench