MOHD LATIF v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK TH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2856/2025 · 2025-10-14
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13759 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13759 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2856/2025
Mohd. Latif
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akhil Ahmed Bardi, Advocate (Through Virtual Mode)
Vs
Punjab National Bank & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER (14.10.2025)
1. After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner would feel satisfied if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the present petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and to decide the same.
2. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and to take a decision thereon in accordance with law most expeditiously preferably within a period of 01 month from the date a copy of the writ petition and a copy of Serial No. 154
2 WP(C) No. 2856/2025
this order is made available by the petitioner to the respondents.
3.
Disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
14.10.2025
SUNIL