Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13759 (CHH)

DR. PUNEET BHARDWAJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2370/2021 · 2025-07-23

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:35799 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2370 of 2021 * - Dr. Puneet Bhardwaj S/o Roop Narayan Bhardwaj Aged About 51 Years Director Professor, Department Of Medical Education, Presently Working As In-Charge Joint Director Cum Medical Superintendent At Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science (CIMS) Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Through The Secretary, Shankar Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Director Directorate Of Medical Education (DME), Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Dean, Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science (CIMS), Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Dr. Pradip Beck Professor, Medicine Department, Department Of Medical Education, Posted At Bharat Ratna Atal Bihari Bajpayee Memorial Medical College, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate For Respondent No. 1, 3 & 4/State For Respondent No. 2 For Respondent No. 5 : : : Mr. Topilal Bareth, Panel Lawyer Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Mr. P.K. Shrivastava, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.07.25 12:37:40 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/07/2025 1. Mr. Vikas Dubey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the sole petitioner has died. He would submit that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the legal representatives of the sole petitioner to revive their prayer, if cause of action still survives. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti