Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137577 (ALL)

FARJANA AKBAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/4197/2025 · 2025-05-02

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25333-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4197 of 2025 Petitioner :- Farjana Akbar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Kumar Pandey,Shiv Shanker Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The counsel for Municipal Corporation, Lucknow says that the application of the petitioner for mutation would be considered and decided, if there is no other legal impediment. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the statement made by the counsel for Municipal Corporation, Lucknow with a further stipulation that a decision be taken in the aforesaid terms positively within two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that we have not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner about the death of her husband nor about her marriage with him. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench