RAHUL SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/3660/2025 · 2025-09-08
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3660 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Ramakant Sahu, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.580 of 2021, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, registered at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 23.08.2021 against three persons, not including the applicant, stating that the informant has made some investments in Shine City Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. but no benefits were returned on the investments. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case merely because he happened to be an employee of the company. The applicant's involvement in 7 other criminal cases of similar nature has been disclosed in para 18 of the affidavit, in which he has been granted bail in 3 of the cases. 5. Co-accused Vikram Singh Yadav, who is the agent of the company, has already been granted bail by this Court. 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that allegations have been established in the investigation and thereafter the charge sheet has been submitted on 15.02.2025, a copy of which has been annexed to the counter affidavit. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakant Sahu, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
keeping in view the fact that there is no allegation that the applicant was the Director or other key position holder in the company; that the applicant has been granted bail in six other cases of similar nature and he is languishing in jail since 07.02.2025., I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicant - Rahul Sharma - be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 8, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 3660 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench