Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1309 of 2024
Nawab alias Jammu
….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S.C. Dumka, AGA for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No.759 of 2024, dated 26.12.2024, under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
According to the FIR, upon been received an information on 25.12.2024, police raided a premises and recovered beef and other articles, but the applicant managed to escape.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that nothing was recovered from him; he has been falsely implicated.
5.
Learned State counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The
2 anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He would submit that the applicant managed to escape.
6.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed.
7.
The anticipatory bail application is allowed.
8.
In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. If the
3 applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
03.01.2025 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686df4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7D EAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.01.03 16:54:42 +05'30'