Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 137501 (MAD)

Sureshkumar. R v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/11506/2023 · 2025-07-07

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.11506 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P(MD)No.11506 of 2023 R.Sureshkumar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Commissioner, Karaikudi Greater Municipality, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to restore the petitioner property to its original position in Town S.No.532 in Patta No.1200 to the extent of 7.73 Cents in Ward No.10, Block-7 towards north of 5 Cents situated at Senjai, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District, within a stipulated 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.11506 of 2023 time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanakumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Ragavendran (for R1, 3 & 4) Government Advocate Mr.E.P.Venkateshwar (for R2) ORDER This writ petition is filed for Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to restore the petitioner property to its original position in Town S.No.532 in Patta No.1200 to the extent of 7.73 Cents in Ward No.10, Block-7 towards north of 5 Cents situated at Senjai, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 2.The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the second respondent has laid a road by encroaching the petitioner's patta land. 3. However, the learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that the above said road belonging to the municipality. 4.After hearing the rival submissions, this Court is of the considered opinion that the identification of the property is in dispute. Therefore, the survey is necessary. The fourth respondent is directed to issue notice to the petitioner as well as to the second respondent to conduct a survey in the presence of the parties 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.11506 of 2023 and submit a report to the third respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The third respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, shall pass appropriate orders in accordance with law after issuing notice to the petitioner and the second respondent, within a period of four weeks thereafter. Based on the order of the third respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, the parties shall adhere to the rights of the parties. 5.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No Costs. 07.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Vsg 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.11506 of 2023 To 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The Commissioner, Karaikudi Greater Municipality, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai, Sivagangai District. 4.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.11506 of 2023 S.SRIMATHY , J. Vsg ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.11506 of 2023 DATED : 07.07.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis