AMITA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BAL VIKAS AND PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/4761/2025 · 2025-05-08
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137495 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27067 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4761 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amita Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Bal Vikas And Pushtahar Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Dhar Dubey,Roshani Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent No.6 is dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State-respondents. Learned standing counsel on the basis of record has submitted that the petitioner though has uploaded online that she has passed the High School and Intermediate however, the mark- sheets of High School and Intermediate have not been uploaded on the portal regarding which the petitioner was intimated at the time of verification. It is submitted that in view of the provisions of Clause 4 of the Government Order dated 21.03.2023, the application forms uploaded by the petitioner has been treated incomplete and that is why she has not been selected. The instructions provided by the learned standing counsel are taken on record. As per the written instructions the selected candidate has secured 11.78 marks in merit as compared to the petitioner who has got 8.38 marks thus, the petitioner being lower in merit could not be selected. In view of these instructions, the writ petition being devoid of merits is dismissed. Order Date :- 8.5.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench