RAHUL SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/3654/2025 · 2025-08-25
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3654 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Ramakant Sahu, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Shikhar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.579 of 2021 under Sections 409/420/467/468/471/120B I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 23.08.2021 against three persons, not including the applicant, stating that the informant had made investments in Shine City Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. for purchasing a plot but the plot was not given to the informant. 4. The applicant has been implicated subsequently because he was the authorized signatory of the Company. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 6. The applicant's involvement in 7 other cases of similar nature has been disclosed in para-18 of the affidavit and he has been granted Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakant Sahu, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
bail in five of those cases. 7. Co-accused- Vikram Singh Yadav, who was agent of the Company and who is named in the FIR has been granted bail by means of an order dated 23.04.2025 passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.2859 of 2025. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the aforesaid case. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Rahul Sharma be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.
August 25, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 3654 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench