K.Vijay Kumar S/o K.Venkatarathnam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary
WP/19044/2017 · 2025-07-24
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13748 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13748 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010166892017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19044/2017 Between: K.vijay Kumar S/o K.venkatarathnam and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal Secretary and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M SHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. 72214/MR. K. RAGHU BABU
2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus, praying the following main relief:-
“……to issue appropriate Writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in relieving the petitioners at the age of 58 years instead of 60 years is contrary to the provisions of Act No.4 dated 27th June, 2014, resolution, contrary to the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court dated 05-05-2017, illegal, arbitrary and ultravires the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents to reinduct the petitioners and continue them in service upto 60 years of age along with consequential benefits in the interest of justice as was being done in all other similarly placed persons by virtue of interim directions of this Hon’ble Court and to pass……”
2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P. Venkata Rama Sarma, learned counsel representing Smt. M.Shalini, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that in view of the Interim Directions dated 13.06.2017, passed by this Court in the present writ petition, no further adjudication is necessary in the lis, accordingly, he sought for the closure of the writ petition.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing for the respondents is present.
4. By recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 25.07.2025 SRT
279
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.19044 of 2017
Date: 25.07.2025
SRT