2025:JHHC:14995 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2519 of 2025 --------- Taiba Hasnain @ Taiba H, aged about 70 years, wife of Late Syed Ghalib Hasnain, resident of Naya Sarai (Idgah Toli), P.O. Murma, P.S. Vidhan Sabha, District Ranchi. ....Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Hon'ble Speaker, Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha, Jharkhand Legislative Assembly, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha, Jharkhand Legislative Assembly, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Secretary, Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha, Jharkhand Legislative Assembly, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 5. The Under Secretary, Jharkhand Vidhan Sabha, Jharkhand Legislative Assembly, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 6. Wajida Hasnain, wife of Late Syed Zahir Hasnain, resident of Idgah Toli, P.O. Murma, P.S. Vidhan Sabha, District Ranchi. ....Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Navin Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Resp.-State : A.C. to A.G. For the Vidhan Sabha : Mr. Anil Kumar, (Standing Counsel) --------- 02/Dated: 10.06.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following reliefs: (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) for granting compassionate appointment to petitioner's younger son namely Syed Nasir Hasnain in place of Syed Zahir Hasnain who was granted compassionate appointment in place of petitioner's husband; (ii) For further issuance of an appropriate writ, order, direction to stop the payment of death cum retiral benefit to the respondent no.6 and the same would be distributed equally among all the legal heirs of the petitioner's husband; (iii) For a direction commanding upon the respondents to clear all the dues which was directed to be given as per the rule; (iv) During pendency of the writ petition, no compassionate appointment should be given to any person. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though 2025:JHHC:14995 2 the petitioner is fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application; however, in spite of repeated representations the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such, the petitioner may be directed to approach the respondent No.3 to look into the matter so that if the case of the petitioner would be found suitable, he may pass necessary orders. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent No.3 to look into the grievance of the petitioner by treating this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter by passing a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner and if the case of the petitioner is found suitable as per the applicable rules and regulations; necessary order be passed in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner shall submit the copy of this writ application to the respondent no.3 at the earliest so that his grievance can be addressed soon. It goes without saying that the entire process shall be completed within a period of 10 weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-