Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13747 (HP)

HET RAM v. SUSHANT TANDON

CRMP/1728/2025 · 2025-05-09

Ranjan Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Het Ram versus Sushant Tondon Criminal Revision No.79 of 2025 09.05.2025 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate vice Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP No.1728 of 2025 After hearing Learned Vice Counsel for some time, prayer is made for withdrawing the instant application for extension in complying with earlier orders, in view of the discrepancies/errors therein, with liberty to file afresh, if so desire. The prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed, by Learned Counsel for the respondent/non-applicant. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as aforesaid. Cr.MP(M) No.79 of 2025 List the matter after two weeks’ before appropriate Bench. (Ranjan Sharma) May 09, 2025 Judge [Shivender]