2025:JHHC:23163 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3395 of 2025 ------ Kajal Kumari, D/o Siteshwar Kumar, R/o Lalit Narayan Mishra Colony, Itki Road, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdev Nagar, District Ranchi. Presently working and posted as Assistant Teacher, BSV Middle School, Niwaranpur, P.O. + P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Office situated at Project Building, P.O. + P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, situated at Ranchi, near Kutchhary Chowk, P.O., G.P.O., Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi, Office at Ranchi, near Kutchhary Chowk, P.O., G.P.O., Ranchi, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Binod Singh, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Shivam Singh, AC to SC-II ------ 04/ 11.08.2025 Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that an advertisement was published in the local newspaper to fill up the five post at B.S.V. Madhaya Vidyalaya, Niwaranpur, Ranchi. It is an admitted case that six persons were appointed though the advertisement was to fill up five posts. Thus, the sixth candidate has been appointed illegally. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a bonafide candidate and she is one of the six candidates. 4. In respect of the same appointment process in relation to other five candidates, in W.P.(S) No.2987 of 2025 (Kumari Vinita Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.), a detailed order has been 2025:JHHC:23163 2 passed with a direction to the Director, Primary Education to take an appropriate decision in the appointment process. Further, it was directed that backdoor entrant, if can be segregated, must be done by the respondents, if there are no other illegalities in the selection process. Further, it was directed that after segregating the backdoor entrant, the respondents will take appropriate decision in respect of other five candidates, including confirmation of their service who have been selected pursuant to the advertisement dated 09.06.2022. 5. Since the petitioner is also claiming that she is one of the candidates, and she is also eligible, case of the petitioner will also be considered along with the five persons by the Director, Primary Education, and appropriate decision shall be taken in respect of appointment process, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-2