LAVKESH RAWAT @ LAVKESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/383/2025 · 2025-04-30
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 137458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24752 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 383 of 2025 Applicant :- Lavkesh Rawat @ Lavkesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Mishra,Vijayendra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anurag Verma, learned Additional Government Advocate-I for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 0321 of 2025, under Sections 69, 123, 352, 351(3) B.N.S., registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki.
3. The learned A.G.A.-I has raised an objection that the applicant has approached this court directly without approaching the sessions court with a prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, which is mandatory in view of law laid down by a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ankit Bharti vs State of UP and another: 2020 (3) ACR 2597.
4. Confronted with this objection, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench